Law + Works + Grace = ?

The stories we tell ourselves shape our lives.

For example, if you buy into a narrative that says, “The Bible is a book of rules we must obey,” you will find laws to obey on every page.

If you believe, “The Bible teaches us to work for God’s favor,” you will find long lists of things to do.

But read the Bible with mindset of grace, and you will get a completely different picture. You will see what Christ has done your behalf, and how you can reign in life by receiving his abundant grace.

Law, works, or grace. Which narrative are you following?

This is an important question when reading a book like James, because James writes about law AND works AND grace. All three are in his letter.

If you did not know any better, you might think that James was saying you need law plus works plus grace. A little bit of each gives you a healthy balance.

Nothing could be further from the truth.

Mixing law, works, and grace is like mixing medicines. Or powerful chemicals. It’s a bad idea. In the new covenant, we are under grace, not law (Rom. 6:14–15). The law is good, but it’s no good for the believer (1 Tim. 1:9).

Yet virtually every book and sermon I have read or heard on James preaches mixture. “You need a little law + a little grace + a lot of works,” and the result is confusion and dead works.

Let me give you some examples:

  • Most commentators say James wrote to Christians, yet in places James calls his readers sinners, adulterers, and friends of the world. He says things like, “you commit murder” (Jas. 4:2). Strong words. You are not an adulterous murderer, are you? Yes, James wrote for believers, but he also wrote for unbelievers. (He says so in chapter 1.) One letter, two messages, and if you don’t know which is which you’ll be confused.
  • James said no one can tame the tongue (Jas. 3:8). It’s impossible. Yet many commentators say things like, “Watch your words and tame your tongue.” They contradict James and promote dead works. We don’t need to try harder, we need a new heart and a new tongue.
  • James wrote about a crown of life. Those who preach works dangle that crown like a carrot. “Endure trials and earn that crown.” But James says the crown is given to those who love the Lord (Jas. 1:12). It’s a gift, not a reward. Big difference.
  • The most famous scripture in James is “faith without works is dead” (Jas. 2:17). The works preachers love this verse, while faith preachers are left wringing their hands in confusion. “James is talking about works of service,” they say. Or “this isn’t a salvation issue.” Yet the context is clearly salvation (Jas. 2:14), justification (Jas. 2:21, 24–25), and being made right with God (Jas 2:23). Either way, you better get busy for Jesus. Which means faith = works. Apparently.

See the problem? Read James with anything other than a grace lens and you’ll come away condemned and confused. You will think we need a little law and a lot of works to supplement God’s grace:

  • You will watch every word lest you complain and come under judgment (Jas. 5:9).
  • You will feel a need to work to prove that your faith is not useless (Jas. 2:20).
  • You will think that God’s forgiveness is conditional and you need to confess your sins to get it (Jas. 5:15–16).

Or…

You could ditch those mixed-up messages and get yourself a grace-based commentary that reveals the “greater grace” of God that runs all through James’ letter (Jas. 4:6).

Just saying.

My new book The Grace Bible: James has just been released. It is 100% grace based guaranteed.

The Grace Bible: James will help you find the gold that is in James’ letter, and will protect you from toxic mixture. It is available now on Amazon and other good booksellers.

22 Comments on Law + Works + Grace = ?

  1. Unknown's avatar jilliefl1 // June 1, 2023 at 4:49 am // Reply

    Can’t wait to dig in to this Paul! After I wrap up your commentary on 1 & 2 Peter which is fantastic by the way 😄

  2. Unknown's avatar Raymond Coutu // June 1, 2023 at 6:18 am // Reply

    James addressed this letter to the twelve fives offs Israel. Paul addressed most of his letters to the church of a particular city or region. I see James as a judaizer.
    Your take?

    • Some people dismiss James as confused about grace. They say he was writing an old covenant message for an old covenant audience. James was no Judaizer. He wrote to those who have faith in Jesus Christ (Jas. 2:1). Like Jesus, he revealed God as a generous Father who gives great grace (Jas. 1:17, 3:9, 4:6). The Jews did not believe in the faith-based justification that James preached. James wrote to the twelve tribes dispersed abroad. This is from the book:

      In New Testament times, there were Jews living all over the world, and many of them visited Jerusalem during the major festivals. On the Day of Pentecost, there were Jews “from every nation under heaven” (Acts 2:5). Jews who came to Jerusalem encountered Jewish Christians and heard about the Messiah who had risen from the dead. Some became believers who carried the good news back to their homes. These new believers needed training, so James, the leader of the Jerusalem church, wrote a letter that they could take with them. For this reason, James wrote for two audiences; (1) those who had received the righteousness that comes by faith in Christ and are known as God’s friends (Jas. 2:1, 23), and (2) those foolish fellows (Jas. 2:20) and sinners (Jas. 4:8) who lack saving faith (Jas. 2:14) and remain enemies of God (Jas. 4:4). So one letter, two messages. Failure to distinguish between these two audiences and messages has led some to wrongly conclude that James was confused about grace or that he preached a message of grace plus works.

      What we take from James’ letter depends on which message we hear. Those who love the Lord are encouraged to rejoice and persevere in trials (Jas. 1:2–3), and patiently await the Lord’s return (Jas. 5:7–8) knowing that we will receive a crown of life (Jas. 1:12). In contrast, those who are relying on their own righteousness hear that their faith is dead and useless (Jas. 2:17, 4:4), and that they need to humble themselves, submit to God, and receive the word that can save their souls (Jas. 1:21, 4:7, 10).

  3. If one knows that the church age is from book of Romans to the book of Philemon. Therefore James is for the Jews again…

  4. Unknown's avatar David Tangwall // June 1, 2023 at 2:53 pm // Reply

    I do not believe James knew anything about Grace. He wrote the book before Paul even had the revelation. Paul said his gospel was a mystery, secret: (something never revealed before). The James gang was always a thorn in Paul’s side. But because he was aJew to the Jew, a lawman to the lawman Paul went along with him. Sometimes paying dearly! James understanding of Grace was to the Gentiles not the Jewish kingdom gospel. He felt the Gentiles were not under law but the Jews were. James would never agree (maybe at the end) that the Jew and Gentile are now equal in the Body of Christ. Another secret of Paul’s. Five years ago I would have never have wrote this. God is Good!

  5. We know that the church age has not ended. We are living in the church age. Praise the Lord, salvation during this period is saved by GRACE through faith NO WORKS.

    However if we do not see that there is no contradiction in the word of God, that’s why we read in context. The book of James is for the salvation of people that are left after the church age. They then can only be saved by Grace through Faith PLUS Works.

    That’s why the book of James does not contradict the other passages in the Bible about salvation.

    Maybe I did not make myself clear in my last post

    After the church age, we see that salvation becomes by Grace through PLUS WORKS.

    • There are no contradictions in scripture. Like Paul, James preached justification by faith (Jas 2:23). The only work that counts with God is the work of believing the One he sent (John 6:29).

  6. Hey Paul, Sounds like a great book! One of things that has helped me understand (at least in some measure) is that James addresses his letter, “To the twelve tribes in the Dispersion…” So it seems that perhaps his first audience were Jewish believers (still trying to obey the law), maybe even some who found their way to Antioch (Gal. 2:12) (tic)?

    I find it fascinating that the revelation of grace that came to the church through Paul did not seem to affect all of the leaders of the church equally. I have looked at James as a Jewish believer who was also zealous for the law. I say that because of his advice to Paul as we see in Acts 21:17-25, but perhaps I have misunderstood.

    I’ll check out your book when I find some free time. Currently most of any free time is being spent on working on a Master’s in Bible. Many blessings, Bret Trasamar

    • Thanks, Bret. Don’t you find it interesting that Paul never confronted James over mixture the way he confronted Peter? Perhaps James wasn’t as confused about grace and some make him out to be. I hope you enjoy the book.

      • Paul, apparently, I should log into word press more often. I do find it interesting regarding Paul and Jame’s relationship. Honestly, they have more in common than meets the eye. The first things I see is in regard to the requirements for apostles according to Peter. One of the first things is that to replace Judas, one must have been a follower of Jesus “beginning from the baptism of John until the day when He was taken up from us—one of these men must become with us a witness to his resurrection.” Neither of them would have qualified by that standard, yet both were apostles, and both wrote at least one epistle. 🙂 Blessings!

  7. Unknown's avatar florry1962 // June 5, 2023 at 1:39 am // Reply

    Great job!
    More grace to you brother Paul!

  8. James was not discussing the law at all. How do I know this? Because his example was Abraham, who was before Moses. Faith needs justification by what you do if you have faith. And that has nothing to do with the law…

    • Like Jesus before him, James preached the Law of Moses (e.g., Jas. 2:9) to the law-abiding Jews. He even quoted two of the Ten Commandments. Like every grace preacher, James esteemed the law and honored the purpose for which it was given (Jas. 2:10, 4:11). The law is not your handbook to homemade righteousness; the merciless law is a mirror that reveals your sin and your desperate need for grace (Jas. 2:9, 11, 13).

      • I stand by my last comment to you. Abraham worked, and it had nothing to do with the law. You get grace thru faith, but at some point, you gotta put your faith in action, otherwise your faith is in vain, meaningless, dead.
        Ed Chapman

      • Yes, faith without works is dead – that’s in the Bible. Like Jesus in John 6:29, James plainly tells us what works are required. He says we need to submit and draw near to God (Jas. 4:7–8). We need to humble ourselves and receive his grace (Jas. 4:6, 10). We need to hold onto the faith of the Lord Jesus Christ (Jas. 2:1). These are the works of faith demonstrated by Abraham, Rahab, and every believer. More here.

      • I don’t recall James discussing GOOD works at all.

      • James discusses faith plus works here.

  9. Could it also be that being so full of grace & having been saturated with it all you now see is grace even in cases where the writer could have been law based Paul?Not that there’s anything wrong with that given that the Lord Jesus himself saw the grace of the Father even when reading the Old Testament & the prophets that many of his contemporaries & probably the writers themselves regarded as law based?

    • Many people seem to think there are only two options: (1) Dismiss James’ letter as written for another time and another people, (2) conclude James was mistaken about grace,

      Both options are dangerous because you end up excising an important part of the Bible, when ALL scripture is useful for training in righteousness.

      I propose we take James a little more seriously and study how he used the law to plow the heart of the self-righteous and reveal their need for grace. Like Paul did. And Jesus.

  10. I really love all this, hashing it out, healthy airing of doubts,confusions,question marks because I believe the Lord wants us to in order to show us where we are still” missing the mark /point”- trying to in our own wisdom,knowledge,understanding -and because yes if we took Gods word literally what was spoken written down Holy Spirit inspired , by trying to interpret,understand be, do from our human perspective.strength then Gods word can seem or be made to appear contradictory,grace/ law mixed which then brings in to effect Galatians 5-4 Galatians 2-21 a faith walk that is impossible,frustrating,powerless,almost lifeless,unvictorious,dead we still all need to get to the place in our awareness that apart from Christ we can be,do nothing- to increasingly rely more on Holy Spirit to do the teaching,revealing,I terpreting,explaining,leading etc Proverbs 3/5-6 Zechariah 4-6

Leave a comment