Why Does the Virgin Birth Matter?

One of the questions asked at Christmas is, “Was Jesus really born of a virgin?”

Is this an important question? Some say no. They say they do not need to believe that Jesus was born of a virgin to believe that he is the Savior.

But the virgin birth matters a great deal, for at least three reasons.

First, the prophets said the virgin birth would be a messianic sign:

Therefore the Lord himself will give you a sign: Behold, a virgin will be with child and bear a son, and she will call his name Immanuel. (Isaiah 7:14)

In the history of the world, there have been billions of births but only one virgin birth. The virgin birth proves that God is with us and not against us (Matt. 1:23). It proves that Jesus came from holy God and not sinful Adam.

Second, John the Baptist said Jesus was the Lamb of God who takes away the sins of the world (John 1:29). Jesus could only do that if he came from outside the world. A sinful son of Adam could not carry our sins, but a Son of God can.

Third, we needed a High Priest untouched by sin (see Heb. 4:15, 1 John 3:5), and a virgin birth provides one.

Such a high priest truly meets our need – one who is holy, blameless, pure, set apart from sinners, exalted above the heavens. Unlike the other high priests, he does not need to offer sacrifices day after day, first for his own sins, and then for the sins of the people. He sacrificed for their sins once for all when he offered himself. (Hebrews 7:26–27, NIV)

Remove the virgin birth and we are left with doubts. Is God really with us? Is Jesus really the sinless Savior? Did he carry all our sins?

Who was Jesus’ mother?

How was Jesus the Son of God “fully human”? The traditional answer is he had a human mother. But this creates two problems. First, any human parent would taint the sinless Savior with original sin – if there was indeed such a thing as original sin. Second, only one human parent implies that Jesus was merely half-human, like Commander Spock from Star Trek.

Theologians are nothing if not inventive so they deal with the first problem by saying original sin is a uniquely male disease. Joseph had it; Mary didn’t. Which means we don’t really need Jesus because Mary could’ve been our sinless high priest.

And they deal with the second problem by… well, actually, they don’t deal with the second problem at all. They just ignore it.

The Son of God was fully human because the Creator who made First Adam was quite capable of making Last Adam. Jesus had no mother, at least not in the biological sense. Jesus is the eternal God, the Creator of all including Mary (John 1:1, Col. 1:15–16).

Just as Joseph contributed no DNA to the Savior, neither did Mary. How could she, since she was just as much a part of Adam’s enslaved family as Joseph. Mary provided a womb, but no egg.

When Christ came into the world, he said, “Sacrifices and offerings you did not desire, but a body you prepared for me.” (Hebrews 10:5, NIV)

The word for body (soma) means a whole body. The Holy Spirit did not prepare half of a body, but a whole one. In the Passion Translation of this verse, Christ says “You have clothed me with a body.”

For most of us, life begins in the womb, but Jesus had no beginning. The Word who became flesh was with God when creation began (John 1:1). Jesus did not need a sperm donor or an egg donor. He needed a body, and that’s what the Holy Spirit provided.

Mary said to the angel, “How can this be, since I am a virgin?” The angel answered and said to her, “The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you; and for that reason the holy Child shall be called the Son of God.” (Luke 1:34–35)

One day, Mary was not pregnant; the next, “she was found to be with child from the Holy Spirit” (Matt. 1:18, ESV).

There is much mystery in this. How did the miracle of the Virgin Birth take place? We don’t know the how, but we know the Who. How did the Word become flesh? The Holy Spirit is the answer.

But when the fulness of the time was come, God sent forth his Son, made of a woman, made under the law. (Galatians 4:4, KJV)

Many translations say Jesus was born of a woman, but on this occasion the King James Version gets it right. Jesus was made of a woman, not born of a woman. (The original verb (ginomai) means to cause, to become, to assemble.) Jesus’ body was brought forth within Mary’s womb.

Incidentally, this explains why Jesus could say that John was the greatest among those born of women (Matt. 11:11). Surely Jesus is the greatest of all, but Jesus was not born of woman in the conventional sense.

All four Gospel writers refer to Mary as the mother of Jesus, but she was not his biological mother. Mary was a surrogate mother who carried and raised the child from heaven.

Mary was an extraordinary woman, highly favored by God, and rightly honored by the Church. Yet nowhere in scripture does Jesus refer to her as mother. Instead, he calls her woman (John 2:4, 19:26).

If you asked Jesus who his mother was, he would reply, “My mother and brothers are these who hear the word of God and do it” (Luke 8:21). Jesus was not being disrespectful to Mary, but like Melchizedek, he was “without father and mother” (Heb. 7:3).

First Adam had no father and mother and neither did Last Adam.

The significance of the virgin birth is that Jesus was not born into Adam’s enslaved family, and only a free man can ransom a slave. Because of Adam, humanity was enslaved to sin and death. But Jesus is our Redeemer from heaven. A Savior such as this, free and untouched by sin, is able to save to the uttermost those who come to God through him.

Truly the virgin birth is essential to our faith.

—–

Extracted and adapted from my ebook, Original Sin: What Does the Bible Really Say?

20 Comments on Why Does the Virgin Birth Matter?

  1. So true. fully agree with this message because Jesus could not be generated from human sinfull flesh. In Mary a fertilized, Divine egg was implanted by the Spirit, both the egg and the seed came from God. the Holy Spirit planted that in her womb.

  2. Unknown's avatar Dane Gressett // November 30, 2023 at 4:42 am // Reply

    Seed of the woman, Seed of Abraham, Seed of David….He had genetics/ biology thru Mary. “Who was born of a descendant of David according to the flesh, who was declared the son of God with power by the resurrection from the dead…” Rom 1:3-4

    You’re in danger of preaching another Jesus in your claims.

    • Jesus was included in Abraham’s line and David’s line so that the promises and prophecies might be fulfilled. But Jesus was not part of Adam’s enslaved race. He is the Man from heaven and the firstborn of a new creation. He came to earth fully human and fully free. Now when we come to Christ we are taken out of the old enslaved race and placed in Christ, the free Man.

      I would be reluctant to equate the word “seed” with biology since the church is also known as the seed (sperma) of Abraham (e.g., Gal. 3:29), yet most of us have no biological connection to the patriarch.

  3. I agree Paul, that God wouldn’t need either sperm or egg to fashion Christ in a womb, but if He didn’t use even the egg of Mary, why set apart the Jewish race who passed along the Seed of Abraham’s faith through Isaac? Why not simply use any random woman from any race of man.

    The way I see it, the Seed of faith was miraculously protected through 400 years of slavery, the Law, and all attempts to eliminate that race. Sin was not passed on from man to woman via his seed, but when it was passed on through human effort, i.e. the flesh. Hence the real, symbolic, reason for circumcision: cutting that away so the life God gave man to pass on in procreation would be undefiled by the flesh. The Jewish race exclusively had that quickened spirit Seed of Isaac, the faith of Abraham, which was able to unite in Mary, with the Holy Spirit, to conceive Jesus, whether He used an egg from her or not. The issue of the flesh in reproduction had long before been remedied from God’s perspective.

    • Hi Joel. I suppose God could have used any woman – he is God afterall – but he was very specific in his choice of Mary on account of the promises made to the Patriarchs and the prophecies of the Old Testament. He had a lot of boxes to tick. At the same time, the Messiah could not be a part of the old creation, but had to be a new creation, born free from sin. Since Mary was as much a part of Adam’s race, she could contribute no DNA. Hebrews 10:5 confirms this. The Virgin Birth is more miraculous than most Christians understand.

      Circumcision was a sign of the covenant between God and Abraham (Gen. 17:11, Rom. 4:11). It was a “badge” that signified the family of Abraham.

      • Unknown's avatar Joel Cooper // November 30, 2023 at 8:33 am //

        In my thinking, Messiah would not have been part of the old creation but born of the righteousness that came by the faith Abe demonstrated to become the father of many nations. I don’t see how Heb.10:5 makes your case for a strictly non-human participation. Son of Man he called Himself as well as Son of God. He became flesh, fully participating in our humanity. Heb.2:14 The promises to the patriarchs were that One would arise from among them to save the world. Mary was indeed part of Adam’s fallen race but was also a child of the promise to Abraham, a necessity for Christ to enter and join in our humanity. Otherwise, what was the point of Abraham’s Seed? And again, circumcision was way more than a badge. It was a symbolic cutting away of the flesh, as the Seed of life could never be passed “through” the flesh.

        Anyhow Paul, I appreciate you always making me think out my own beliefs. We are usually most simpatico. God bless Joel Cooper

      • Thanks for the comment. Yes, Jesus was fully human and fully flesh AND completely separate from Adam’s enslaved race. As the psalms say, only a free man can ransom a life. Moses is the symbol here. If Moses wasn’t the prince of Egypt, he could not have freed the Hebrew slaves. If Jesus was not the prince of life, he could not have free the Adamic slaves.

        There is no need to invent a biological explanation for the prophecies and doing so means you run foul of the scriptures just mentioned. As the Creator, Jesus was “without father and mother” (Heb. 7:3). If God made first Adam, he can make last Adam. Mary contributed nothing.

      • Unknown's avatar Joel Cooper // November 30, 2023 at 9:02 am //

        Yes, Christ from eternity was without father or mother. Jesus, the Son of Man, had to have a physical mother to both become flesh like us, and to become the Godman to stand in our place as the second Adam. I’m sorry, which scripture do we run afoul of in this view?

      • The scriptures listed in the article. If I haven’t convinced you by now, I probably won’t. But for what it’s worth, a slave or a son of a slave cannot ransom a slave (Ps. 49:7–9). Eve, Abraham, David and Mary were all part of Adam’s race, enslaved to sin. Jesus, in contrast, is the free-born Deliverer who gave his life as a ransom for all. Jesus was constantly telling his disciples that the Son of Man had been “sent from heaven.” In other words, he was the heavenly Man who could save the enslaved descendants of Ada.

        I know tradition teaches that Mary contributed DNA, but it’s simply not possible and there is nothing in scripture to suggest she did.

        Jesus is the Head of the new creation family and the Author of new life. Abraham, David et al. were put into Christ, not the other way around.

      • Unknown's avatar Joel Cooper // November 30, 2023 at 10:19 am //

        You say “a slave or a son of a slave cannot ransom a slave”. This is true. But Paul makes it clear who are slaves and who are free in Galatians 4 saying: For it is written that Abraham had two sons, one by the bondwoman and one by the free woman. But the son by the bondwoman was born according to the flesh, and the son by the free woman through the promise. This is allegorically speaking, for these women are two covenants: one proceeding from Mount Sinai bearing children who are to be slaves; she is Hagar. Now this Hagar is Mount Sinai in Arabia and corresponds to the present Jerusalem, for she is in slavery with her children. But the Jerusalem above is free; she is our mother.

        In this allegory, if Hagar is in slavery with her children, Sarah is the free woman who bore free children from above. Her children, those Jews who held tightly to the same faith of Abraham, from Isaac down to Jesus, would be free men spiritually. That seems to be the point Paul is making here and would eliminate your objection.

      • I trust you know the meaning of allegory. Allegorically, Abraham is the father of all who believe, but you don’t actually carry his biological DNA. Nor did Jesus. Abraham was not free from the law of sin and death and nor were his descendants. If they were free, there would be no need for Jesus to come and set them free. There would be no need for the Holy Spirit.

        Allegorically, Sara corresponds to the Jerusalem from above. “Jerusalem above is free; she is our mother” (Gal. 4:26). Notice how the heavenly Jerusalem is free. Sara is not free. There is no freedom except that which is in Christ Jesus.

        I have given several scriptures showing that Mary contributed no DNA to the Man sent from heaven. You have given me nothing but symbols and allegory. I hope you agree that scripture must be our final authority.

  4. As far as a virgin birth goes, we still have a fertilized egg growing inside the body of a sinful woman. If the baby received any of her sinful blood, he would have no power to save.What nobody knew back then was that the mother does not share one drop of blood with the child growing inside of her. If she did, they could both die. This is how a mother with one type of blood can grow a baby inside her womb with a completely different type of blood and not die. Only God knew this truth back then and it was discovered by a man I believe in the late 1800s and I believe he was a Jewish man.

  5. Unknown's avatar Earl Hendricks // November 30, 2023 at 8:21 am // Reply

    I am amazed how even though I had read about the virgin birth before, it is only after reading your post that I feel I really understand now. Thank you.

  6. Plain, simple, straightforward and so obvious when pointed out like this.It still absolutely astounds me that I still fail to SEE the obvious – that of course this is how ABBA God did it and why and why not !! He is God – nothing is impossible for Him and it still absolutely astounds me that I believed and swallowed all the other nonsense made up attempts at explaining “ the Virgin birth” and other “ fantasy stuff” about the Lord that now seem so ridiculous that I can’t quite believe I actually believed them over the Truth that’s why I need the Holy Spirit thank God in Jesus’ name for God’s Holy Spirit!

  7. This is such a great enlightenment for someone who is at times confused about Mary’s role.

  8. May we know Him as He is, as He came to reveal to us.

  9. Unknown's avatar Delores Cooper // December 1, 2023 at 6:36 am // Reply

    On Dec. 8 we celebrate the Solemnity of the Immaculate Conception of the Blessed Virgin Mary. This Holy Day is often misunderstood. It is the conception of Mary, not Jesus.. Mary was conceived without the stain of sin, thus making her a worthy vessel for the Son of God. Contemplate the Archangel Gabriel’s mission and salutation; Mary’s virginal fear; the Most Holy Virgin’s faith and consent; the creation of the soul and the formation of the body of Jesus Christ in the womb of Mary by the Holy Spirit; the Virgin Mary being taken body and soul into Heaven by God; the eternal predestination of Mary as the Masterpiece of God’s hands.

  10. The significance of the virgin birth is it reveals Jesus’ unique and sinless nature. By being born of the virgin Mary, Jesus was not born into the obsequious caged family of Adam. This is crucial for our faith because only a sinless Savior could offer himself as the perfect sacrifice for our sins. Hebrews 7:26, clarifies this, “For it was indeed fitting that we should have such a high priest, holy, innocent, unstained, separated from sinners, and exalted above the heavens.” Because Jesus was born of a sinless nature, now he is able to offer himself as the perfect sacrifice to redeem us today from all sins. Thank you Jesus!

  11. Unknown's avatar Melkamu Kejela // December 6, 2023 at 8:03 pm // Reply

    Much grace. Many thanks.

  12. Totally disagree that Christ had none of Mary’s DNA. Sun passes through the father, hence he must have had God as His. The son of God, the Son of Man. Mary was not just a holding tank for a holy conception.

Leave a reply to Sally Cancel reply