What Did James Say About Grace?

And why is his book in the New Testament?

“Did James understand grace? Were he and Paul on the same page? Are we saved by faith plus works like he said? Should his book be in the Bible?”

People have been asking these questions for hundreds of years. According to some, James did not understand the gospel of grace. Well, maybe he did a little bit. But he was confused. And too Jewish. Either way, you can’t learn much about grace from James.

Before we proceed, here’s a pop quiz I’m calling…

“Which apostle?”

Can you guess which apostle…

  1. …was not one of the original twelve but had an encounter with the Risen Lord?
  2. …wrote letters that were included in the New Testament?
  3. …wrote about the great grace that comes from a God who loves to give?
  4. …used Abraham as an example when writing about the justification that comes by faith?
  5. …warned about the curse of living under the law?

If you answered “James”, you have nailed it. James was truly an apostle of grace.

“Wait. I thought you were describing Paul.” In that case, let’s play again.

Can you guess which apostle…

  1. …was called by God to preach to the Jews and tailored his message to suit Jewish audiences?
  2. …sometimes practiced old covenant rites and rituals including circumcision?
  3. …bragged that he knew the Jewish religion better than just about anyone?
  4. …wrote a letter exclusively for the Jews where he expounded on the gospel of Christ?
  5. … frequently quoted the Law of Moses?

Yes, this was Paul. (Scriptures to support these answers can be found at the end of the article.) Paul did all these things, yet no one says he was confused about grace. Or too Jewish. But poor James gets thrown under the bus. Let’s look at five myths people believe about James.

Myth 1: James didn’t understand Paul’s message of grace

Fact: James was one of the first people to hear the gospel of grace from Paul. He heard it way back in Acts 9, not long after Paul returned from Damascus. (Paul mentions their meeting in Gal. 1:19.) If Paul alone received some special insight into the mystery of Christ, chances are James heard about it before anyone, and he heard it long before Paul went on his first missionary trip.

Myth 2: James disagreed with Paul

Fact: James supported Paul. At the Jerusalem Council there was a dispute between Paul and Barnabas and those of the circumcision group. Who did James support? He went with “our beloved Barnabas and Paul” of course (Acts 15:25).

Much of what James said about circumcision, idol food, and sexual immorality mirrored what Paul would later write in his epistles. There is no hint that the Jerusalem apostles needed to be convinced by Paul about God’s acceptance of the Gentiles and his grace for all people. The only source of division came from the party of the circumcision.

Myth 3: James added law to grace

Fact: James preached the curse of law, just like Paul. James never preached the works of law for that what contradict what he said about the justification that comes by faith (see below).

It’s true that James asked the Gentile believers to abstain from eating idol food for the sake of their Jewish brothers, but so did Paul. James also encouraged the believers to avoid sexual immorality, just like Paul.

Myth 4: James wrote for Jewish audience (and not for us)

Fact: James’ first letter was addressed to Gentile believers (Acts 15:23). It’s true that his epistle was written for the Jews (see Jas. 1:1), but so was Hebrews and the Gospel of Matthew. Are we going to dismiss those books as too Jewish? There isn’t one gospel for Jews and another for Gentiles. The good news is for all of us, regardless of race or tribe.

Myth 5: James did not preach justification by faith

Fact: Actually, he did (see Jas. 2:23).

There is a lot of misunderstanding about James and Paul but the facts are plain. They BOTH preached justification by faith and they BOTH used Abraham as their exemplar believer. They BOTH preached on the great and abundant grace of God and they BOTH wrote letters to Jews and Gentiles.

What’s the problem with James?

The problem is when James says, “A man is justified by works and not by faith alone” (Jas. 2:24). How do you read it? Many people swing one of two ways:

  1. John Calvin’s response: “Faith alone saves, but saving faith is never alone.”
  2. Martin Luther’s response: “James was preaching law so you can ignore him.”

So either (a) you need works that prove your faith, in which case James was preaching “another gospel” making him a cursed preacher, or (b) James was preaching the law with all its curses for disobedience. In either case, his is a cursed book and you should have nothing to do with it.

What infamy! What an insult to a man who knew more about grace that most of us ever will.

The problem is not with James. The problem is with our definition of “works”.

Two kinds of works

When Paul says a man is justified by faith and not works, he is referring to the works of the law (Gal. 2:16). “For we maintain that a man is justified by faith apart from works of the law” (Rom 3:28).

But when James says we are justified by works, he is referring to works of faith by which he means believing in Christ.

This is the work of God, that you believe in him whom he has sent. (John 6:29)

We are not justified by works of law (Paul), we are justified by works of faith (James). And lest there be any confusion about works of faith, James use the same example and quotes the exact same scripture as Paul:

James: “Abraham believed God, and it was credited to him as righteousness” (Jas. 2:23)
Paul: “Abraham believed God, and it was credited to him as righteousness” (Rom. 4:3)

Same message, same example, same gospel.

What did James say about grace?

James preached about the grace that God gives to the humble and the justification that comes by faith. He touched on the new creation, what it means to be righteous, and intimacy with God. He scorned “worthless religion”. He was good friends with the apostle of grace and the two men vouched for and quoted each other.

When I first called James a preacher of grace and an apostle of grace in 2010, some said I was reaching. But when I launched my grace-based commentary on James in 2023, it became the best-selling book in The Grace Bible series.

This suggests people are ready to give James another chance. They don’t want to hear that the New Testament epistles contain a mixture of law and grace because that’s confusing. But don’t take my word for it. Listen to Paul.

In the bonus materials that accompany this article on Patreon, I trace the 20-year friendship between Paul and James. These two great apostles were more than friends, they were allies and partners who steadfastly resisted the Judaizing influences in the early church.

Read James in context and you will find he says wonderful things about the new creation, faith, and the grace of God. BTW, you don’t need to buy my book to discover the treasures in James. You can read it all for free on The Grace Commentary.

More questions about James

Quiz answers

James’ encounter with the Risen Lord is mentioned in 1 Cor. 15:7. James wrote two letters that are found in the New Testament; the epistle of James and the letter recorded in Acts 15:23–29. When James wrote about the “greater grace” God gives to the humble, he used a word (megas) that means exceedingly great, high, large, loud, and mighty (Jas. 4:6). Like Paul, James quotes Gen. 15:6 which says “Abraham believed God, and it was reckoned to him as righteousness” (see Jas 2:23). And like Paul, James said the law curses and condemns those who try to live by it (see Jas. 2:10).

Paul was known as the apostle to the Gentiles but he was also called to preach to the Jews (Acts 9:15). Paul said “to the Jews I became a Jew, so that I might win Jews” (1 Cor. 9:20). If circumcising Timothy and engaging in purification rites in Jerusalem was going to help win people for Jesus, Paul was happy to do it (Acts 16:1-3, 18:18, 21:24-26). “To those who are under the Law, as under the Law though not being myself under the Law, so that I might win those who are under the Law.” Paul knew more about the Jewish religion and the Jews’ ancestral traditions than just about any of his peers (Gal. 1:14, Php. 3:5–6), and the letter he wrote especially for the Jews was, of course, Hebrews. Paul quoted the Law of Moses frequently (e.g., Rom. 7:7, 12:19, 13:9, 1 Cor. 9:9, Eph. 6:2–3, Gal. 5:14).

21 Comments on What Did James Say About Grace?

  1. I thought also that James walking in mixture of 10 commandments and Grace. His book in New. T is so tiny only 5 chapters(and not in good translation).But Paul wrote allmost all the books in New. T. But to say that Paul had mixture example….”2)…sometimes practiced old covenant rites and rituals including circumcision? WoW !Any scripture which supports that theory?!

    • If we judged NT epistles on the basis of size and dismissed the small ones, we’d have to get rid of the epistles by Peter, Jude, as well as some of those by Paul and John. Paul never preached mixture, but he did act Jewish to win Jews. You asked about my quiz questions. The answers, with supporting scriptures, are at the bottom of the article above.

  2. If James is referring to works of faith, by which he means believing in Christ, then James 2:24 essentially says “A man is justified by believing in Christ and not by faith alone”. Are they not the same. Am I missing something?

    • It helps to read that passage in context. Remember, he’s talking to monotheistic Jews. “You believe that God is one.” He commends them for their faith in one true God but then rebukes them in the very next sentence. He’s says they are missing something, namely “faith in our glorious Lord Jesus Christ.” Faith in God that is not matched by the work of believing the Son is no different from what the demons have.

      • Makes perfect sense, but why say it in code?
        Rather than; “20 But are you willing to acknowledge, you foolish person, that faith without works is useless?”, simply say “But are you willing to acknowledge, you foolish person, that faith in God without belief in Jesus is useless?”
        If that is what he means, why write it such that we have to do mental gymnastics to understand?
        The context seems to be works as providing for “15 If a brother or sister is without clothing and in need of daily food.”
        The examples of Abraham and Rahab’s works were not about belief in a savior either.
        Not trying to be argumentative. Just trying to understand.

      • It probably made more sense 2000 years ago to people reading his letter in the original language and culture. Understand that in the church, there were Jews who believed in God and Jews who believed in Jesus. From the very first verse of his letter, James makes it plain where his allegiance lies. “James, a bond-servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ.”

        The Jews who believed in God but did not share his “faith in the glorious Lord Jesus” (Jas. 2:1), had a dead and useless faith, said James. “Your faith is non-functioning, inoperative, and no better than demons. Can such a faith save you?” Like the Lord, he encourages them to be like their father Abraham. “Your father Abraham rejoiced to see My day, and he saw it and was glad” (John 8:56).

        I talk about James 2:15 here.

    • Thank You.But did not found scripture for this 2)…(Paul)sometimes practiced old covenant rites and rituals including circumcision?

      Cannot find anywhere….WOW!
      Enlighten me?!

      • Acts 16:1-3 (circumcision of Timothy), Acts 18:18 (Nazirite haircut), Acts 21:24-26 (purification ceremony). In addition, it was Paul’s habit to visit Jewish synagogues on his travels.

      • Yep,thanks.Seems Paul followed just some cultural tradition like example we do in my country …where ppl eating blood-sausage.Some of my fellow christians told me oh,thats a sin and not allowed according to Old.T and New.T…but its cultural in my country and i love it(its delicious).These things not shaking my faith in GRACE of God!

  3. Thank you Dr Ellis/brother in Christ. I am so blessed to read this and I believe its God’s confirmation to me as it has come at a time, as more recently I’ve come across a believer… who I would say is completely misunderstood James and quite frankly I have been appalled with the infamy as you put it. Once again, thank you. God bless you and your ministry. I will be sharing your post. Grace and peace to you,Emily

    • For 500 years, people have been saying James was on a different page from Paul. Martin Luther casts a big shadow. Personally, I am more impressed with Paul’s take on James.

  4. I appreciate this very much.

  5. Great article! But wasn’t the haircut to satisfy James’ accusations of Paul saying, “they have been informed about you teach all the Jews who are among the Gentiles to forsake Moses, saying that they ought not to circumcise their children nor to walk according to the customs.”

    In Galatians, James’ associates were sent to spy, and Peter was scared of being Gentile around them.

    I’m not saying James didn’t know Grace, but it appears he had a hard time abandoning the laws of Moses, which is to be considered due to the nature and culture.

    I used to teach that James was dealing with justification before men, but a closer look suggests he was talking about justification before God.

    Just my thoughts..

    • Paul’s behavior around James is significant. Instead of rebuking him as he did a certain other apostle who was momentarily confused about the new covenant, he agreed with James that to reach Jewish people you can’t trample on their traditions. Paul, like James, quoted the Laws of Moses, because both of them understood the proper purpose of the law. Yes, James was talking about justification before God. Like Paul, he held up Abraham as an exemplar of the faith (Jas. 2:23) and he encouraged his readers to put their faith in the Lord Jesus Christ (Jas. 2:1).

      • Paul rebuked Peter, because Peter was there in his turf(James wasn’t there). Also, it is clear, the Peter was “momentarily confused about the new covenant” only **after** some Jews came from “James” – not before, but after. “But when Peter was come to Antioch, I withstood him to the face, because he was to be blamed. For before that certain came from James, he did eat with the Gentiles…” (Gal 2:11-12, KJV). These don’t seem to be some outside disciples, but disciples close to James himself-in his inner circle. They ought to have known better than to follow traditions.
        Also, It stands to reason that Peter wasn’t confused at all, but afraid: “…fearing them which were of the circumcision…” (Gal 2:12, KJV). Exactly like He was afraid of the little girl and denied Jesus(the truth), it stands to reason that He is repeating the same denying the “truth of the gospel”. For Peter to be afraid of these disciples from James, they must have had some serious power in the church at the time.

      • Yes, Peter was intimidated by these Judaizers. But as for these disciples being close to James, that was not the case. After “certain men from James” came to spy out the liberty of the Christians in Antioch, Paul and Barnabas went to Jerusalem to sort things out. When James heard what had happened, he said “I never sent these men, they went out without my authorization” (Acts 15:24). Having disowned the Judaizers, James wrote Paul a letter of recommendation so that the Gentile churches would know that he and Paul were on the same page.

  6. Hey Paul thanks for coming to the rescue of my name-sake While in my early walk with the Lord I was like many others who thought James was having a bad-hair day when he penned James 2:24, because he has been maligned over 1 verse. Over more recent years, with help from gifted scholars like you, I have come to understand what was behind this. Thanks Paul for your dedication and scholarly research over many years to ensure the message of God’s amazing grace is comprehended by Christians of all persuasions around the world, though I am sure we will never fully comprehend it on this side of Heaven! What a gift to the Body of Christ.

    Please pass my thanks to Camilla and your children for their sacrifice in releasing you to fufil God’s calling upon your life. I am sure there were times you children wished Dad had a ordinary job like teacher, lawyer, doctor, etc.

  7. Unknown's avatar sallymorris1973 // November 14, 2024 at 8:29 pm // Reply

    It’s so great that that the actual truth and reality of the gospel ( and Old Testament) – “ wholly good news for all “ past ,present,future is finally being unearthed,separated out from the incorrect,twisted,distorted Interpretation/translation ( manmade misinterpreted/ assumed,shaped in correctly )- put in its proper,correct context !!! Hallelujah!!! – thank You Jesus because Hosea 4:6 has been happening for/ to us all for too long!!!and our wonderful Father/ Saviour/ Redeemer has been “misquoted “ been given a bad rap/ reputation” for far too long!!!

  8. Unknown's avatar Pam Osthoff // April 7, 2025 at 9:35 am // Reply

    How do i purchase this book

Leave a reply to James Goss Cancel reply